Tuesday
Jan 06th
Home 
Latest
Latest |
Report a comment Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site. Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report. Comment in question Go back to the article |
mXcomment 1.0.7 © 2007-2009 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
Copyright © 2006 - 2009 kimmediagroup.com.
The views and opinions of authors and advertiser expressed on Kenya Empowerment Newspaper Website do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Kim Media Group. In no event shall Kim Media Group be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any such content, goods, or services available on or through any such site or resource.
The views and opinions of authors and advertiser expressed on Kenya Empowerment Newspaper Website do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Kim Media Group. In no event shall Kim Media Group be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any such content, goods, or services available on or through any such site or resource.
Posted by BMJ muriithi06-18-2008 17:44, , Guest
As I read the story, I thought it could easily pass for fiction until I got the part that says that the analysis from the National Medical Services (NMS) returned a "guilty" verdict based on DNA Match. The NMS labs are nationally renowned for their competence in toxicology and forensic testing. I do not want to sound pessimistic but it might prove very difficult for the suspect to exonerate himself. Most DNA cases that have been prosecuted in the recent past have ended up incriminating the suspects. How I wish this, somehow, will turn out to be a mistake. The whole story is so shame!
» Reply to this comment...